DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
7
w V
TY)
ro Lu du
Fant L wel
{W
STM *
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your desire to change your RE-3M reenlistment code.
Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not
sufficient to warrant such a change due to your ineligibility for
reenlistment in your current rating. Again, you were assigned
the appropriate reenlistment code for your situation.
Accordingly, your application nas peen aenied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in your case. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence ef probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. ‘WEILL
Executive Director
Su
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4276 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. After being afforded all of your procedural rights, you received an entry level separation due to erroneous enlistment on 24 February 1987. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07704-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when a Sailor is discharged at the completion of his term of active obligated service and is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10321-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 July 2010. In this regard, you were assigned the appropriate reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03279-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 29 September 2000. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02646-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 July 1977 at age 18. At that time you were correctly assigned an RE-2...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09186-09
In this regard, you were assigned the least stigmatizing appropriate reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Finally, Sailors discharged by reason of a personality disorder would normally be assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00968-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 November 2010. In this regard, you were assigned the appropriate reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10663-09
‘ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2010. On 5 March 2004, you were notified that the Defense Security Service (DSS) investigation had denied you a security clearance. .Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05785-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 May 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00365-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. application on 2 November 2011. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.